Yuam

Johnson v. Yuam

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20215:20-cv-08542California1,415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-08542-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v. Re: Dkt. No. 22 CHARLES YUAM, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Scott Johnson (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant action against Defendants Charles Yuam and Lily Yuam (“Defendants”), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff contends that at the times relevant to Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendants owned the real property located at 313 Brokaw Road, Santa Clara, California, upon which the business Wig & Hair Piece Outlet is located. Id. ¶¶ 2-3. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Id. Although Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge (Dkt. 7), Defendants have not appeared in the action or consented. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.