King

King v. United States Penitentiary

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20211:21-cv-08310California200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARREL KING, Case No. 21-cv-08310-RMI Plaintiff,

ORDER OF TRANSFER

v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY, ll Defendant.

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed a pro se habeas petition, but after reviewing the filing it is 14 || clear that Plaintiff seeks relief regarding the conditions of his confinement pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 392-97 (1971). Plaintiff presents 16 || allegations pertaining to events that occurred at the United States Penitentiary Victorville where he || is incarcerated. That prison is located in the Central District of California. The acts underlying this complaint occurred in the Central District, where and Plaintiff and Defendants reside. Venue, 19 || therefore, properly lies in that district and not in this one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly, 20 || this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of || California. See 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.