Citcon USA, LLC v. MaplePay Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20215:19-cv-02112California5,657 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CITCON USA, LLC, Case No.19-cv-02112-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOURTH v.

AMENDED COMPLAINT

13 HANG “HANK” MIAO, and others, Re: ECF 90

Defendants.

16 Defendants Hang “Hank” Miao and Dino Lab, Inc. move to dismiss Plaintiff Citcon USA, LLC’s Fourth Amended Complaint, ECF 90 (“MTD”). As before, Citcon alleges that Defendants engaged in trade secret misappropriation of Citcon’s Source Code. See ECF 89, Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Again, however, Citcon fails to allege sufficient facts to support its claims against Miao and Dino Lab. The Court finds that Citcon’s FAC continues to allege vague and conclusory claims that are implausible. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss. Because the Court finds that further amendment would be futile, leave to amend the complaint is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The Court previously discussed the formation of MaplePay and RiverPay…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.