Threde

Threde v. Brandrep LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20213:21-cv-03013California2,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SYLVIA SCHICK, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03013-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION

TO TRANSFER VENUE

BRANDREP LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 44 Defendant.

12 On August 27, 2021, defendant BrandRep, LLC (“BrandRep”) filed a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) pursuant to rule 12(b)(3)1 and a motion for a transfer of venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1404. Dkt. No. 44. (MTD/MTV). Plaintiffs oppose both motions. Dkt. No. 45. (Opp.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the November 12, 2021 hearing. Upon consideration of the parties’ papers and arguments made therein, the Court DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC and DENIES defendant’s motion to transfer venue. 20 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3), a defendant may move to dismiss a 21 case for improper venue. Venue is generally proper in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.