IN RE PFA INSURANCE MARKETING LITIGATION
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 IN RE PFA INSURANCE MARKETING Case No. 4:18-cv-03771-YGR
LITIGATION
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER
OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Dkt. No. 224
Before the Court is the Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge filed by defendant Premier Financial Alliance, Inc. (“PFA”). (Dkt. No. 224.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and Civil Local Rule 72-2, defendant challenges Magistrate Judge Kim’s order finding that Mr. Jack Wu is a “managing agent” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). (Dkt. No. 221.) The undersigned ordered further briefing on defendant’s motion on October 19, 2021. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions and the record in this case, the Court DENIES defendant’s motion for the reasons stated herein. I. Background In order to expedite the issuance of this Order, the Court assumes…