Vasquez
Vasquez v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICK VASQUEZ, Case No. 21-cv-06400-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO COMPEL
ARBITRATION
CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC, et al., Docket No. 12 Defendants.
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Nick Vasquez, individually, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of a putative class of other customers similarly situated, alleges that Defendants Cebridge Telecom CA, LCC and Altice, USA, Inc., doing business as Suddenlink Communications (collectively, “Suddenlink” or “Defendants”), engaged in false advertising by failing to disclose a “Network Enhancement Fee” for internet services, and misrepresenting that the fee is a tax or government regulation. Vasquez asserts claims under California law pursuant to the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law and Unfair Competition Law seeking public injunctive relief, declaratory relief and restitution. Now pending is…