Vasquez

Vasquez v. Cebridge Telecom CA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20213:21-cv-06400California6,365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 NICK VASQUEZ, Case No. 21-cv-06400-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

CEBRIDGE TELECOM CA, LLC, et al., Docket No. 12 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Nick Vasquez, individually, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of a putative class of other customers similarly situated, alleges that Defendants Cebridge Telecom CA, LCC and Altice, USA, Inc., doing business as Suddenlink Communications (collectively, “Suddenlink” or “Defendants”), engaged in false advertising by failing to disclose a “Network Enhancement Fee” for internet services, and misrepresenting that the fee is a tax or government regulation. Vasquez asserts claims under California law pursuant to the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, False Advertising Law and Unfair Competition Law seeking public injunctive relief, declaratory relief and restitution. Now pending is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.