Shuman

Shuman v. SquareTrade Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20213:20-cv-02725California9,873 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL SHUMAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02725-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTION FOR

SQUARETRADE INC., SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 64, 67

12 I. INTRODUCTION This putative class action was initiated by Plaintiff Michael Shuman, who alleges that Defendant SquareTrade, Inc. (“SquareTrade”), which sells service contracts for the protection of consumer goods, consistently fails to provide consumers with the full terms and conditions of the contract at the time of purchase and systematically pays reimbursement in an amount that is less than the purchase price of the covered item when claims are filed. After the Court granted in part and denied in part SquareTrade’s motion to dismiss, dkt. 47, a First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FACC”) was filed adding Tommy Gonzales and Kathleen Abbott as plaintiffs. Presently before the Court are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.