Andaya

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Andaya

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20215:21-cv-00760California5,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-00760-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A

DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

EMMANUEL ANDAYA, RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. No.

13 Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike 3”) filed this action for copyright infringement and now moves for default judgment. No party has consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Additionally, defendant Emmanuel Andaya has not appeared and is in default. All named parties must consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction before a magistrate judge may hear and decide a case. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1); Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). Because not all parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, this Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this action to a district judge, with the following report and 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.