Andaya
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Andaya
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-00760-VKD
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A
DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
EMMANUEL ANDAYA, RE MOTION FOR DEFAULT
JUDGMENT
Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. No.
13 Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike 3”) filed this action for copyright infringement and now moves for default judgment. No party has consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Additionally, defendant Emmanuel Andaya has not appeared and is in default. All named parties must consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction before a magistrate judge may hear and decide a case. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1); Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2017). Because not all parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, this Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this action to a district judge, with the following report and 22…