Pfeister

Pfeister v. Action Property Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20213:21-cv-04473California3,160 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNA L. PFEISTER,

Case No. 21-cv-04473-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

ACTION PROPERTY MANAGEMENT,

INC., Defendant.

15 Plaintiff Joanna L. Pfeister filed this action in federal court, asserting various state law causes of action. Defendant Action Property Management moves to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 Dkts. 14–15. Defendant argues that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because both parties are citizens of California, and thus Plaintiff has not established diversity jurisdiction. Defendant also argues that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to each of Plaintiff’s four claims. As Plaintiff has not carried her burden of establishing diversity jurisdiction, and Plaintiff does not assert federal question 22 jurisdiction, the case is dismissed due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.