Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

OMAR GOMEZ, Case No. 19-CV-05266-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTIONS IN LIMINE

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 69, 71, 72, 74, 75,

JORDAN FACHKO, et al., Defendants. 17 Before the Court are Plaintiff Omar Gomez’s (“Plaintiff”) three motions in limine, ECF Nos. 69, 71, & 72; and Defendants Jordan Fachko and the City of Santa Clara’s (collectively, “Defendants”) three motions in limine, ECF Nos. 74, 75, 76. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court rules as follows: Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine1 Motion in Limine #1: Plaintiff seeks to exclude all evidence and testimony of which Officer

1 Each of Plaintiff’s motions in limine contains a notice of motion that is separately paginated from the points and authorities in support of the motion. Civil Local Rule 7-2(b) requires that the notice of motion and the points and authorities in…