BP Products North America Inc. v. Grand Petroleum, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20214:20-cv-00901California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BP PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC., Case No. 4:20-cv-0901-YGR

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE MOTION

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION

GRAND PETROLEUM, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 123, 128 Defendants, 12 _________________________ 13

AND RELATED CROSS CLAIMS

Plaintiff BP Products North America Inc. (“BP”) has filed a Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration of this Court’s Ruling Regarding PMPA preemption. (Dkt. Nos. 128 (“Mot.”), 123 (“Order”).) Reconsideration is an “extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests of finality of conservation of judicial resources.” Kona Enters., Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000) (discussing Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)). Under the local rules, a party seeking consideration must show: (1) that “a material difference in fact or law exists from that which was presented to the Court before entry of the interlocutory order for which reconsideration is sought;” (2) “[t]he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.