Baton

Baton v. Ledger SAS

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20213:21-cv-02470California8,392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EDWARD BATON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-02470-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS

LEDGER SAS, et al., Docket Nos. 55, 56, 58 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, customers who purchased a hardware wallet to protect cryptocurrency assets, bring a putative class action seeking redress for harms they allegedly suffered stemming from a data breach exposing over 270,000 pieces of personally identifiable information, including customer names, email addresses, postal addresses and telephone numbers. Docket No. 33 (First Amended Complaint or “FAC”). Now pending before the Court are Defendants Shopify USA, Shopify, Inc. and Ledger’s respective motions to dismiss the complaint for, among other reasons, lack of personal jurisdiction. Docket Nos. 55, 56, 58. For the following reasons, the Court finds that it lacks personal jurisdiction over each …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.