Berryhill

Rogers v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20214:19-cv-01252-KAWCalifornia1,107 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEANNIE SHERRELL, Case No. 19-cv-01252-KAW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY'S FEES

NANCY A BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff brought this action seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”). Following the Court’s remand of the case for further proceedings, the Commissioner granted Claimant’s1 application for benefits, entitling Claimant to $147,376 in retroactive benefits. (Mot. for Attorney’s Fees at 3, Dkt. No. 35; see also Exh. 1 at 2, Dkt. No. 35-1.) Plaintiff’s counsel, Martha Yancey, now brings a motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B), seeking an award of $25,725. (Mot. for Attorney’s Fees at 1.) The Court deems the matter suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the papers filed by the parties and the relevant legal authority,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.