Razavi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 MELINA RAZAVI, Case No. 17-cv-04341-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

CARLOS COTI and GEICO INSURANCE

COMPANY,

13 Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Melina Razavi, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action after 16 being involved in an automobile accident. She sues the other driver, Carlos Coti (“Coti”), and her 17 own insurer, Geico Insurance Company (“Geico”). The Court ordered service of process by the 18 U.S. Marshal at the addresses for defendants provided by Plaintiff. See ECF 24. On November 2, 19 2021, the U.S. Marshal returned unexecuted summons as to both Coti and Geico, indicating that 20 they could not be located at the addresses provided by Plaintiff. See ECF 27. 21 “In cases involving plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis, the Court routinely orders the 22 U.S. Marshals Service to serve the summonses and complaints on the defendants.” Figueroa v. 23…