Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. v. Sigray, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20215:21-cv-01129California2,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, Case No. 21-cv-01129-EJD (VKD)

INC.,

9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DECLARE THE SUFFICIENCY OF v. ITS TRADE SECRETS IDENTIFICATION AND TO COMPEL

SIGRAY, INC., PRODUCTION OF DOUCMENTS

12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 65 13 Plaintiff Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. (“Zeiss”) sues defendant Sigray, Inc. (“Sigray”) for patent infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and unfair competition. Dkt. No. 15. Zeiss now moves for an order declaring that its identification of trade secrets complies with the requirements of California C.C.P. § 2019.210 and requiring Sigray to produce documents sufficient to show the structure, function, and operation of Sigray’s accused products. See Dkt. No. 65; Dkt. 65-5 at 6. The Court held a hearing on the motion on October 19, 2021. Dkt. No. 73. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.