Hsu
Hsu v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 DARRU K HSU, Plaintiff, No. C 11-02076 WHA v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND Defendant.
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S FRCP
54(b) MOTION 15 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, which a prior order dismissed in August 2011, pro se plaintiff once again moves for relief. For the reasons that follow, pro se plaintiff’s motion under FRCP 54(b) is DENIED. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why he should not be deemed a vexatious litigant. STATEMENT The background of this case is set forth in our prior orders (Dkt. Nos. 35, 69, 94, 110). In brief, plaintiff Darru Hsu entered into a wrap agreement with defendant UBS Financial Services, Inc. for investment and advisory services. Hsu brought this action under the Investment Advisors Act, alleging that defendant provided services “in its capacity as an investment advisor,” but that a “hedge clause” in his agreement…