Lacy

Lacy v. Miyamoto

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20213:21-cv-03377California999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROY DONOVAN LACY, Case No. 21-cv-03377-HSG

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION,

v. DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

PAUL MIYAMOTO, FOR DISCOVERY Respondent. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Petitioner, an inmate housed at San Francisco County Jail, filed this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a 2016 conviction for second degree murder. Dkt. No. 1. Now pending before the Court is Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss and a request for appointment of counsel and for discovery. Dkt. No. 7. DISCUSSION I. Background On May 25, 2021, the Court found that the habeas petition stated the following cognizable claims for federal habeas relief: Miranda violation, erroneous admission of Petitioner’s statement made in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.