Madrigal
Madrigal v. Performance Food Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JORGE MADRIGAL, Case No. 21-cv-00021-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION; DENYING
MOTION TO DISMISS PUNITIVE
PERFORMANCE TRANSPORTATION, DAMAGES REMEDY
LLC,
Re: Dkt. No. 49 Defendant.
13 With leave of the Court, defendant Performance Transportation, LLC (“PTL”) seeks reconsideration of this Court’s order denying PTL’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) with respect to the sufficiency of plaintiff Jorge Madrigal’s request for punitive damages pursuant to California Civil Code § 3294. Dkt. No. 49. Mr. Madrigal opposes PTL’s motion for reconsideration. Dkt. No. 54. PTL’s motion is suitable for decision without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court grants PTL’s motion for reconsideration but, on reconsideration, denies PTL’s motion to dismiss Mr.…