Sifuentes
Sifuentes v. Dropbox, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, Case No. 20-cv-07908-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
VIDEO OR TELEPHONIC HEARING
v. AND TO APPOINT COUNSEL
DROPBOX, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 38 Defendant.
Pending before the Court is pro se plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes’s motion for video or telephonic hearing and for appointment of counsel. See Dkt. No. 38 (“Mot.”). I. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VIDEO OR TELEPHONIC HEARINGS Prior to each hearing, parties will be notified of the format of the hearing, i.e. whether the hearing will be held in-person, via telephone, or over Zoom. The parties can also refer to the scheduling notes on the website for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (cand.uscourts.gov/judges/gilliam-haywood-s-hsg/) for updated information on the Court’s standard practices. Any requests to change the format of a hearing should be made on a hearing-by-hearing basis.…