Prendez

Prendez v. Superior Court of California Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20213:21-cv-08245California312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

FILED

Nov 18 2021 1 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN FRANCISCO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RICHARD PRENDEZ, Case No. 21-cv-08245-TSH Petitioner, v. ORDER OF TRANSFER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

RIVERSIDE,

Respondent.

Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Salt Creek Camp in Paskenta, California, and is || challenging his conviction from Riverside County Superior Court. Dkt. No. 1 at 2. Paskenta is || located in Tehama County, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. || Riverside County lies within the venue of the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 84(b)-(c). i || Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of Zz || conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Federal courts in California traditionally have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.