IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20213:14-cv-03264California3,597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST MDL Case No. 17-md-02801-JD

LITIGATION

Case Nos. 14-3264 (Flextronics’ action); 17-3472; 17-7046; 17-7047; 18-2657; 19-1902

ORDER RE MOTION TO EXCLUDE

DR. LESLIE M. MARX

11 MDL Dkt. No. 652

13 Among the many constituent cases in this multi-district antitrust litigation are six actions brought by companies that opted out of the direct purchaser class to pursue claims on their own. In those direct action plaintiff (DAP) cases, defendants filed a Daubert motion to exclude the opinions of Dr. Leslie M. Marx, an economist retained jointly as a testifying expert witness by the DAPs. Dkt. No. 652. The Court held a concurrent expert proceeding, known informally as a “hot tub,” after which the parties filed supplemental briefs. Dkt. Nos. 1380, 1388, 1389. The request to exclude Dr. Marx is denied, with some limited exceptions. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.