Rubalcava

Rubalcava v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20215:20-cv-04191California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Case No. 20-cv-04191-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA’S

v. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b); AND VACATING Defendants. HEARING ON MOTION [Re: ECF 104]

13 Defendant County of Santa Clara has filed a motion for entry of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The motion is fully briefed, and the Court finds it to be suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The hearing currently set for February 24, 2022 is VACATED. The motion is DENIED as discussed below. On July 15, 2021, the Court issued an order dismissing all claims against the County with leave to amend in part. See Order, ECF 88. Plaintiff did not amend within the time provided. He …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.