Rasool

Rasool v. Amtrak

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20213:21-cv-06510California1,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2 FARHAN RASOOL, ET AL., CASE NO. 4:21-cv-06510-YGR

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION; SETTING

vs. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE

UNION CITY, ET AL. Dkt. Nos. 6, 18, 26 Defendants.

8 Presently pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore’s Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute (“Report”). (Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiffs Farhan Rasool and Mehwish Khalid have filed a timely objection to the Report and Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 25, 26.) Having carefully considered the Report (Dkt. No. 18), the Objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 25), and the Motion for De Novo Determination (Dkt. No. 26), the papers submitted in support of plaintiffs’ motion and objections, and the record in the case, for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby OVERRULES plaintiffs’ objections IN PART, ADOPTS the Report IN PART, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.