Rasool
Rasool v. Amtrak
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2 FARHAN RASOOL, ET AL., CASE NO. 4:21-cv-06510-YGR
Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION; SETTING
vs. COMPLIANCE DEADLINE
UNION CITY, ET AL. Dkt. Nos. 6, 18, 26 Defendants.
8 Presently pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore’s Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute (“Report”). (Dkt. No. 18.) Plaintiffs Farhan Rasool and Mehwish Khalid have filed a timely objection to the Report and Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 25, 26.) Having carefully considered the Report (Dkt. No. 18), the Objections to the Report (Dkt. No. 25), and the Motion for De Novo Determination (Dkt. No. 26), the papers submitted in support of plaintiffs’ motion and objections, and the record in the case, for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby OVERRULES plaintiffs’ objections IN PART, ADOPTS the Report IN PART, and…