HD Silicon Solutions LLC v. Microchip Technology Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20213:21-cv-08295California4,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff HDSS filed this lawsuit accusing Microchip of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 7,260,731 (the “’731 Patent”); 7,870,404 (the “’404 Patent”); 7,810,002 (the “’002 Patent”); 6,748,577 (the “’577 Patent”); 7,154,299 (the “’299 Patent”); 7,302,619 (the “’619 Patent”); and 6,774,033 (the “’033 Patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). HDSS also identifies the following products in its Complaint: Microchip’s PIC24 family of microcontrollers with eXtreme Low- Power or XLP technology (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 16, 31); Microchip’s PIC32MZ DA, PIC 32MZ EF, and PIC32MK microcontrollers (ECF No. 1 ¶ 109); Microsemi PolarFire FPGAs (ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 91, 127); and SAM L11 microcontrollers with ARM TrustZone technology (ECF No. 1 ¶ 52) (collectively, the “Accused Products”). Plaintiff HDSS is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, with a principal place of business in the Southern District of California. ECF No. 29 at 1. HDSS is managed by Fahim Aftab, who resides in and conducts HDSS’s business from

the Southern District of California. Id. Defendant Microchip is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.