J.P.
J.P. v. County of Alameda
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4 J.P., BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD Case No. 4:17-CV-5679-YGR LITEM SHANNON VILLANUEVA,
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL IN LIGHT OF
Plaintiff, THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION; GRANTING
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
vs. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, ET AL., Re: Dkt. Nos. 117, 135, 163, 164, 165
Defendants.
10 Currently pending in this Section 1983 action are (I) the parties’ dispute about the effect of 12 the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the claims against the County defendants (Dkt. Nos. 163, 164, 165); 13 and (II) defendant Triad’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 117). Having carefully 14 considered the papers and the oral arguments at the September 29, 2021 hearing, and for the reasons 15 stated below, the Court DISMISSES the claims against the individual County defendants and the 16 negligence claim against Triad. The Monell claims against the County and Triad shall remain 17 pending insofar as they are based on the Fourteenth Amendment claim; otherwise, the Monell claims 18 are DISMISSED.…