Freeman

Freeman v. Summit Filtration Technology, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20213:21-cv-06838California4,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL D. FREEMAN, Case No. 21-cv-06838-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PARTIAL MOTION TO

v. DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL

JURISDICTION OR TRANSFER

SUMMIT FILTRATION TECHNOLOGY, VENUE LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendants’ partial motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, alternatively, to transfer venue. (Dkt. No. 19.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefing, and having had the benefit of oral argument on November 18, 2021, the Court DENIES the motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and declines to transfer venue. BACKGROUND I. Complaint Allegations Plaintiff is a former employee and former member of Summit Filtration Technology, LLC (“Summit”), which he sues along with its owner and managing member Stanley E. Kieffer. (Dkt. No. 8 ¶ 1.) Plaintiff originally filed in Alameda County Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.