Romero

Romero v. Greenwich Logistics, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20213:20-cv-09106California1,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARTURO ROMERO, Case No. 20-cv-09106-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS; STRIKING IN

PART OPPOSITIONS; AFFORDING

GREENWICH LOGISTICS, LLC, et al., PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE THIRD

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

12 Before the Court are two motions, filed September 20, 2021: (1) defendant Greenwich Logistics, LLC's ("Greenwich") "Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Second Amended Class Action Complaint"; and (2) defendant Amazon Logistics, Inc.'s ("Amazon") "Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Second Amended Class Action Complaint." Plaintiff Arturo Romero ("Romero") has filed opposition to each motion,1 to which each defendant has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motions, the Court rules as follows.2 In the operative complaint, the Second Amended Class Action Complaint ("SAC"), Romero alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.