Gordon

Gordon v. Pacchetti

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20213:20-cv-03910California9,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS GORDON, Case No. 20-cv-03910-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. No. 50 FRANCISCO, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carlos Gordon brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) and officers Vincent Pacchetti and Tyler Dove of the San Francisco Police Department. Defendants move for summary judgment on all claims. The Court held a hearing on November 19, 2021. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Facts at Issue This section is provided for the convenience of the reader and is not intended as a complete summary of the evidentiary record. Because evidence is construed in favor of the non-moving party on summary judgment, this order generally presents the facts at issue in a light favorable to Gordon. Nothing in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.