Maslic

Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20215:21-cv-02556California5,505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

SASA MASLIC, et al., Case No. 21-CV-02556-LHK

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v.

DISMISS

ISM VUZEM D.O.O., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Saša Maslic, Ivan Drzaic, Robert Hernaus, Leopold Hubek, Leon Hudoldetnjak, Elvis Koscak, Tomica Panic, Stjepan Papes, Željko Puljko, Darko Štante, Nedeljko Živani, Gogo Rebic, and Mitja Pogorevc (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) were employees of Defendants ISM Vuzem d.o.o.; ISM Vuzem USA, Inc.; Vuzem USA, Inc.; HRID-MONT d.o.o.; Ivan Vuzem; and Robert Vuzem (collectively, “Vuzem”). Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Vuzem, Defendant Eisenmann Corporation (“Eisenmann”), and Defendant Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”). Plaintiffs allege various violations of federal and California labor law, all of which arise from Plaintiffs’ time working at a facility owned by Tesla. ECF No. 1-1 (“First Amended Complaint” or “FAC”). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.