Farr

Farr v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20215:20-cv-07753California4,666 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 M.F., Case No. 20-cv-07753-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DENYING

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 22,

12 Plaintiff M.F.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)2 denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. M.F. contends the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in four respects. First, M.F. contends that the ALJ erred in improperly evaluating the medical opinion of examining psychologist Dr. San Pedro. Second, M.F. contends the ALJ erred in failing to identify M.F.’s PTSD as a medically determinable and severe impairment. Third, M.F. contends that the ALJ erred in finding that her impairments do not meet or medically equal a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.