Valle

Valle v. Morgado

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20213:21-cv-05636California6,898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FRANCISCO VALLE, Case No. 21-cv-05636-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

PAUL MORGADO, et al., Docket No. 13 Defendants.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Francisco Valle brings this action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California state law after having been wrongfully convicted of attempted murder and incarcerated for thirteen years due to the alleged misconduct of San Francisco Police Department (“SFPD”) officers Paolo Morgado and Dennis Cravalho (together, “Officer Defendants”), other unknown SFPD officers and the City and County of San Francisco (“the City”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff brings twelve claims under federal and state law. Now pending is Defendants’ motion to dismiss seven of Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Docket No. 13 (“Motion to Dismiss”). For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.