Maude
Maude v. DOES 1 through 10
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ERIN K. MAUDE, Case No. 21-cv-08353-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE EX PARTE MOTION FOR
EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, Re: Dkt. No. 6 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff Erin Maude moves ex parte for an order authorizing service of subpoenas on three internet service providers (“ISPs”) so that she may obtain documents identifying the unnamed defendants in this action. Dkt. No. 6. The Court deems this motion suitable for determination without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Because Ms. Maude has not demonstrated good cause for the proposed discovery, the Court denies the motion without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Ms. Maude filed this action on October 27, 2021 alleging that unknown persons accessed her computers, electronic devices, and online accounts in violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, and California Penal Code…