Carlson

Carlson v. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20213:21-cv-06133California1,914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOUGLAS F. CARLSON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-06133-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER;

DENYING REQUEST TO STAY

COLORADO CENTER FOR DISCOVERY; VACATING HEARING REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, LLC, et al., Defendants. 12 Before the Court is defendants Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, LLC (“CCRM”), Sarah Macleod (“Macleod”), and Angela Fouts-Hyatt’s (“Fouts-Hyatt”) “Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue to the District of Colorado,” filed October 15, 2021. Plaintiffs Douglas F. Carlson and Maya Zubkovskaya have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for December 3, 2021,1 and rules as follows. By the instant motion, defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.