Johnson v. Alameda County Sheriff Department - Santa Rita Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20214:20-cv-08283California5,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ETTA JOHNSON, Case No. 20-cv-08283-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR

MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 15 11 Defendants. 12 Defendants Alameda County Sheriff’s Department, Santa Rita Jail, and Alameda County Sheriffs Does 1-20 (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiff Etta Johnson’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for civil rights violations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (b)(6), or for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e). (“Mot.”) [Docket No. 15.] Johnson is self-represented. The court held a hearing on November 17, 2021 by Zoom at which counsel for Defendants appeared. Johnson did not appear but likely as a result of connection problems. For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is denied in part and granted in part. Johnson is granted to leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.