Codexis, Inc. v. Codex DNA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20213:20-cv-03503California722 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 4 CODEXIS, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03503-MMC (RMI)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO REOPEN DISCOVERY

CODEX DNA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 95 Defendant.

10 Now pending before the court is jointly-filed letter brief through which Plaintiff seeks to compel the production of additional documents falling into six categories of information, and through which Plaintiff also seeks an order providing for the deposition of three persons. See Ltr. Br. (dkt. 95) at 3. Defendant opposes these requests and contends that Plaintiff “now seeks to reopen fact discovery 6 months after it closed to serve new discovery requests that could and should have [been] served during discovery, and to exceed the 10-depositions under Rule 30(a)(2) to depose witnesses it knew of and chose not to depose.” Id. at 4. Plaintiff does not contend that its discovery requests were tendered during the period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.