Roberts

Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20214:19-cv-02935California1,935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES EVERETT HUNT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02935-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 160, 165 BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of judgment against Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”). Dkt. No. 160. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, and the Court only briefly summarizes them here as relevant to the pending motion for entry of judgment. In his second amended complaint, Lead Plaintiff James Everett Hunt and additional plaintiffs asserted violations of the federal securities laws under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933; Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.