E.E

E.E v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20213:21-cv-07585California959 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 E. E., et al., Case No. 21-cv-07585-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION HEARING

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants.

9 Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for a hearing on December 2 at 11:00 a.m. The Court directs the parties to be prepared to address the following questions: 12 Students Covered By TRO 1. What has happened with the 15 students covered by the TRO? From the briefing it appears that for at least some of these students, school districts planned to implement virtual instruction this week. Has that happened, and how has it been implemented, including for students at non-public schools? 2. Plaintiffs’ December filing states that counsel have identified additional students from five school districts who need immediate relief. How many school districts are involved among all the 26 students? When are plaintiffs filing declarations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.