PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JH KELLY, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-05381-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RULE 54(B) JUDGMENT AS TO JH

v. KELLY’S MECHANICS LIEN CLAIM

AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.., Re: Dkt. No. 68 et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Pending before the Court is Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (“PG&E”) motion under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for judgment as to JH Kelly LLC’s (JH Kelly) first claim for Foreclosure of Mechanic’s Lien. See Dkt. No. 68 (“Mot.”). The motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. No. 75 (“Opp.”) and 77 (“Reply”). For the reasons explained below, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This construction dispute arises out of the Burney K2 Replacement Project (“Project”), which involved the replacement of a natural gas compressor unit and various upgrades at the compressor station near Burnley, California. Dkt. No. 18 (“FAC”) ¶ 11. The Burney Compressor Station is part of PG&E’s natural gas…