Shotwell
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MANUEL SHOTWELL, No. C 15-2894 WHA (PR) Plaintiff,
ORDER REOPENING CASE;
v. SCHEDULING DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS; TO SHOW CAUSE RE.
CHAVEZ-EPPERSON; E. MEDINA; S. UNSERVED DEFENDANTS
BEYER; SMITH; BOLES; FLOREZ;
GARCIA; VARGAS; PETERSON;
RAMIREZ; AVILA,
14 Defendants.
16 Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals affirming in part and 17 reversing the part the judgment and remanding the case to this court for further proceedings, 18 within 90 days of the date this Order is filed, defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment 19 or other dispositive motion regarding the remaining claims, as described in the Court of Appeals’ 20 order (ECF No. 170). Within 90 days of the date this order is filed, plaintiff shall show cause why 21 the claims against the unserved defendants should not be dismissed for lack of service under Rule 22 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 23 If defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, 24 they shall…