The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20213:18-cv-01199California3,108 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Case No. 18-cv-01199-VC

LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR

UNIVERSITY,

ORDER #3 RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR

Plaintiff, SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 106, 114, 120, 123

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

This is the third order to address the cross motions for summary judgment filed by Stanford and HP/Agilent (Dkt. Nos. 106, 123). The cross motions between HP and Nokia (Dkt. Nos. 114, 120) are moot due to a settlement between the parties (Dkt. Nos. 183, 185). Part I of this order addresses the main issues that remain in Stanford’s motion. Stanford’s motion is denied on those issues. Part II addresses three issues that remain in HP’s cross-motion. HP’s motion is denied on those issues. Although the parties have raised several issues in their motions beyond those addressed here, all agreed at oral argument to limit the scope of the motions to the issues discussed in this ruling. Thus, the motions as to all issues not discussed are denied as moot. I. Stanford’s SJ Motion, Part III.B (Dkt. No. 106). Stanford moves for summary judgment as to HP’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.