Caston
Caston v. Finner
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CHARLES CASTON, Case No. 21-CV-06098-LHK
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
WITH PREJUDICE AND DENYING
v.
MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER
TROY FINNER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 3 Defendants. 17 On August 9, 2021, Plaintiff Charles Caston (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”), and a motion for a temporary restraining order. ECF Nos. 1–3. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order as moot. Plaintiff’s complaint names ten defendants: Troy Finner, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Mark Zuckerberg, Prescilia Zuckerberg, Tilma Fertitta, Barbara Bush Coyne, George Bush Jr., Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton (collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 1 at 1. The complaint states that Defendants violated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments…