Caston

Caston v. Finner

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20215:21-cv-06098California1,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

CHARLES CASTON, Case No. 21-CV-06098-LHK

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITH PREJUDICE AND DENYING

v.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER

TROY FINNER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 3 Defendants. 17 On August 9, 2021, Plaintiff Charles Caston (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint, an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”), and a motion for a temporary restraining order. ECF Nos. 1–3. For the reasons below, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice for failure to prosecute and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order as moot. Plaintiff’s complaint names ten defendants: Troy Finner, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Mark Zuckerberg, Prescilia Zuckerberg, Tilma Fertitta, Barbara Bush Coyne, George Bush Jr., Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton (collectively, “Defendants”). ECF No. 1 at 1. The complaint states that Defendants violated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.