Valenzuela

Valenzuela v. Best-Line Shades, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20213:19-cv-07293California1,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOLORES VALENZUELA, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07293-JSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

v. WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR

DEFENDANTS

BEST-LINE SHADES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.

12 Now pending before the Court is the motion of Leiann Laiks, and the law firm of Fusion Legal, PC, to withdraw as counsel for Defendants Best-Line Shades, Inc., Best-Line, Inc., and Jill Schaffer.1 (Dkt. No. 61.) Defendants have not responded to the motion, although the time for them to do so has passed. After carefully considering Counsel’s motion, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS the motion as set forth below. DISCUSSION Counsel seeks to withdraw from representation of the Best-Line entities because they filed Certificates of Dissolution on June 12, 2020 and no longer exist as legal entities. (Dkt. No. 61 at 3.2) In addition, Counsel seeks to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.