1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 21-cv-08619-VKD

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX

10 v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE

TO SERVE A THIRD-PARTY

11 JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP SUBPOENA

ADDRESS 67.180.9.243,

12 Re: Dkt. No. 8 Defendant.

13 14 Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike 3”) seeks leave to serve a third-party subpoena on 15 Comcast Cable (“Comcast”) prior to a Rule 26(f) conference. 16 Strike 3 has established that good cause exists for it to serve a third-party subpoena on 17 Comcast, the above-referenced subscriber’s internet service provider. See Gillespie v. Civiletti, 18 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980); UMG Recording, Inc. v. Doe, No. C08-1193 SBA, 2008 WL 19 4104214, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2008). Strike 3 has demonstrated that (1) it can identify the 20 defendant with sufficient specificity such that the Court can determine that the defendant is a real 21 person or entity who could be sued in federal court, (2) it has identified previous steps taken to 22 locate the elusive defendant, (3) its action against the defendant could withstand a motion to 23 dismiss, and (4) there is a reasonable likelihood of being able to identify the defendant through 24 discovery such that service of process would be possible. See Columbia Ins. Co. v. 25 Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. 573, 578–80 (N.D. Cal. 1999). Once Strike 3 learns the defendant’s 26 identity, it cannot rely on a bare allegation that a defendant is the registered subscriber of an 27 internet protocol address associated with infringing activity to state a plausible claim for direct or 1 (9th Cir. 2018). However, at this stage of the proceedings, and upon the record presented, Strike 3 2 || properly may serve discovery to ascertain the defendant’s identity. See generally Glacier Films 3 (USA), Inc. v. Turchin, 896 F.3d 1033, 1036, 1038 (9th Cir. 2018) (observing that the district 4 || court’s case management order permitting “limited discovery from an Internet Service Provider to 5 || establish a potential infringer’s identity” was “a sensible way to manage its dockets”). 6 || Accordingly, the Court grants Strike 3’s application and orders as follows: 7 1. Strike 3 may serve a Rule 45 subpoena on Comcast commanding Comcast to 8 || provide Strike 3 with the true name and address of the subscriber to whom Comcast assigned IP 9 address 67.180.9.243. Strike 3 shall attach a copy of this order to any such subpoena. 10 2. Comcast shall serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this order on the 11 subscriber within 30 days of the date of service of the subpoena on Comcast. Comcast may serve 12 || the subscriber using any reasonable means, including written notice sent to the subscriber’s last 5 13 known address, transmitted either by first-class mail or via overnight service. 14 3. Strike 3 may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena 3 15 served on Comcast for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Strike 3’s rights as set forth in its 16 || complaint. 3 17 4. Comcast may object to the Rule 45 subpoena and may also seek a protective order. 18 If Comcast produces information regarding the identity of the subscriber to Strike 3, Strike 19 3 shall not publicly disclose that information absent consent of the subscriber or leave of court. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: December 3, 2021 22

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI

United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28