Whitaker

Whitaker v. MZM Fakhouri, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20215:21-cv-03327California1,378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 5:21-cv-03327-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

v. RELIEF; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO STRIKE

MZM FAKHOURI, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 16 Defendant.

On August 25, 2021, Defendant MZM Fakhouri, Inc., filed a motion for administrative relief requesting that the Court order Plaintiff to provide documentation of attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to General Order 56. Motion for Administrative Relief and for Monetary Sanctions (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 14. The motion also seeks monetary sanctions (reimbursement for the costs associated with bringing the motion) for Plaintiff’s refusal to comply with General Order 56. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike Defendant’s motion for administrative relief and an opposition to the motion. Plaintiff’s Motion for Administrative Relief to Strike (“Mot. to Strike”), Dkt. No. 16; Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.