Saul

Lee v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20215:20-cv-02245California6,822 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 A.L., Case No. 20-cv-02245-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT AND DENYING

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 22

13 Plaintiff A.L.1 appeals from a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”)2 denying her applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 1381, et seq. A.L. contends that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in four respects. First, A.L. contends that the ALJ improperly weighed the medical opinions of her treating psychiatrist Dr. Haycraft. Second, she contends that the ALJ improperly evaluated her own testimony. Third, she contends that the ALJ failed to consider statements submitted by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.