Lam

Ratto Bros., Inc. v. Lam

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20214:20-cv-04178California1,371 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RATTO BROS., INC., Case No. 20-cv-04178-PJH Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

MODIFYING IN PART MAGISTRATE

NAM D LAM, JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 30, 32, 33

13 This case was reassigned to this court on October 18, 2021 after Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu issued her Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Dkt. 30) to deny plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment (Dkt. 25). On October 29, 2021, plaintiff moved for a de novo determination. Dkt. 32. The motion is now ripe for consideration and the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. See Cal. N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having conducted a de novo review of the R&R, plaintiff’s motions, and the pleadings in this matter, the court finds that the R&R is well reasoned and correct as a matter of law on almost all matters raised. Accordingly, the court adopts it in part and modifies it in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.