Khan

Khan v. Payton

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20215:20-cv-03086California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN, Case No. 20-03086 BLF (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO

v. FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

M. PAYTON, Defendant. (Docket No. 27)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against an officer at San Quentin State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. On June 14, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and granted leave to amend an equal protection claim. Dkt. No. 22. In the alternative, Plaintiff was advised that he may file notice to proceed solely on the cognizable claims identified in the order. Id. at 8. Plaintiff has filed a motion for a second extension of time of 90 days to file a second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 26. Defendant has filed a statement of non- opposition to Plaintiff’s motion. Dkt. No. 27. For good cause shown and Defendant’s non-opposition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.