Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20214:21-cv-08522California183 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE KOENIG, Case No. 21-cv-08522-PJH Plaintiff, 8

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

9 Re: Dkt. No. 1 10 11 12 Plaintiff, a Missouri state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil action. Plaintiff has now filed a notice stating that he did not seek to open a new case and seeks to voluntarily dismiss this action. Docket No. 5. Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 1) is DENIED and this case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). No fee is due. To the extent plaintiff seeks to file a motion in Scholl v. Mnuchin, 494 F. Supp. 3d 661 (N.D. Cal. 2020), any such request is denied. That case is closed. If plaintiff seeks relief regarding his economic impact payment, he must file a case in the appropriate district in Missouri. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 8, 2021 23 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge 26 27