Perun

Perun v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20213:21-cv-03888California1,673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE PERUN,

Case No. 21-cv-03888-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

15 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Steve Perun seeks a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) to prevent the foreclosure of his home, scheduled for tomorrow. Perun did not prevail on a Motion to Dismiss (“MTD”) on all his claims, and his subsequent amended Complaint does not help his case sufficiently to change the outcome. Thus, Carrington’s current Motion to Dismiss is granted, and consequently, because Perun cannot show he is likely to succeed on the merits, his application for a TRO is denied. II. BACKGROUND Perun fell behind on his mortgage payments, and the lenders sent a notice of Default in January 2021. He applied for a modification, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.