Pruitt

Pruitt v. Bayer U.S. LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20213:19-cv-07951California3,366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEROY L PRUITT,

Case No. 19-cv-07951-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BAYER U.S. LLC,

13 Defendant.

15 I. Introduction In this employment discrimination and wrongful termination lawsuit, Defendant Bayer U.S. L.L.C. (“Bayer”) moves for summary judgment. Dkt. 70. Plaintiff Leroy Pruitt opposes the motion. Dkt. 75. In his opposition, however, Pruitt does not meaningfully respond to Bayer’s legal arguments. Pruitt does not provide any evidence to support his opposition, beyond allegations and assertions made in his memorandum in opposition to the motion. Even when making all justifiable inferences in Pruitt’s favor, Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc., 501 U.S. 496, 520 (1991), summary judgment for Bayer is appropriate. Pruitt has not set out evidence to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation based on his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.